Latest Updates: business RSS

  • Is the new DroboPro for you?

    admin 8:07 on Tuesday, 14. April 2009 | Comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , appliance, argumentation, business, compliance, data robotics, device, , drobo. drobopro, express, , firewire, harddisk, , iscsi, jbod, marketing, mount, , , pci, pcie, presentation, rack, raid, san, sata, , smb, , terabyte, , , webcast

    Last week Data Robotics, the company behind the Drobo personal data robot, announced their new product: The DroboPro

    Like the current Drobo it’s a shiny black box that will fit any kind of 3,5” SATA disk you fit into it and create a virtual storage volume using up as much space as possible while keeping all your data save from loss due to disk failure. The improvements are mainly found inside the box. The Pro fits 8 instead of only 4 SATA disks, reduced noise by utilizing two bigger fans on the back and sports a 1Gb/s Ethernet port that’s dedicated to using iSCSI.

    This means you can now hook the DroboPro to any Ethernet port you have and connect it to your your computer via iSCSI. The only requirement is that your computer has to have a second Ethernet port, that you can configure to only use the iSCSI protocol. This will give you read/write speeds up to 100 MB/s on the Drobo disks.

    This all sounds great, so where’s the catch?

    The DroboPro will start at $1299. If you a small business and want to include the DroboPro into your server rack, there’s a rack mounting kit available, for another $150. If you want to add 8 reliable 1TB hard drives, this will be another $800.

    $2200 isn’t that much for a SMB storage solution, but there are some things about the DroboPro that bother me more than the price.

    1. The device is marketed as an SMB solution with rack mounting capabilities, but it’s only 12” wide and 3U high, so there’s 7” of wasted space. Usually a 19” 3U NAS has space for 12 3,5” or 24 2,5” disks, the DroboPro only fits 8 3,5” SATA disks. The DroboPro is totally single device, so there’s no way of extending, combining multiple DroboPro to act as a single device. This is bad news for everyone that needs to scale beyond the current 16TB barrier or 8 disk limitations.

    2. The rack mounting kit adds another $150 to the DroboPro price tag while it’s included for free with most competitor’s devices. I’m not absolutely sure what exactly is worth $150 from the pictures,  but for a mere metal mounting plate with plastic clip-ons it’s way over top.

    3. The DroboPro only has a single power supply. I’m not sure about Data Robotics or you, but I like my power supplies redundant, just in case one of them fails. Imagine you company unable to work because the DroboPro’s power supply is broken and you have no ways to access your 16TB of files until the replacement DroboPro has arrived.

    4. Security: The device itself cannot be locked. The only theft prevention is a Kensington lock connector on the back and the disks can easily be placed into another DroboPro. So, if you want to prevent a massive data theft, you’ll have to lock the DroboPro itself into a rack or shelf.

    To answer a few of my questions I attended a webcast on Thursday in hope that some of my doubts might be addressed. Instead of the expected product presentation for SMB customers it turned out to be a “for dummies” presentation. The host took unnecessary lengths to explain the different RAID systems (limited to 1, 5 & 6) and why Drobo’s “Beyond RAID” was much superior to them.

    With the info I currently have, “Beyond RAID” is a simple JBOD with a virtual storage volume file on it. The controller takes care of the data redundancy on the physical disks, so a single or dual (on a DroboPro) disk failure won’t lead to any data loss. Although this is a kind of storage virtualization, it’s not nearly as sophisticated as a professional storage systems or Data Robotics marketing would like to make you believe.

    Just as I expected from the setup of the webcast, none of my questions where answered.

    But for whom is this DroboPro really made?

    Data Robotics says it’s for professionals and small businesses that need fast high capacity storage. what they didn’t mention or answer is what a small business is for them. I’ve been in the industry for a few years now, and one thing I know is that every product vendor has it’s own definition of the SMB market. The range of defined SMB company sizes varies from 1-100 to 100-10,000. For the DroboPro my guess would be more in the 1-100 employee range.

    These are companies that in most cases only have one or a part time administrator with limited knowledge. No offence, but I met a lot of them and you usually only get what you pay for.

    If you’re one of these businesses and don’t care if your file services go offline for days in case of failure, go an buy one. It’ll be much better than any NAS of fileserver you might currently have. Just make sure it’s not placed on the Administrator’s table, secured with a Kensington lock.

    Should your company approach IT services in a more professional way, the DroboPro might not be your first choice. The missing power redundancy, limited scalability will drive you into a dead lock sooner or later and lack of device security could be a serious compliance issue.

    If you’re a professional working with large quantities of data like music, photos or videos this could be a rather price worthy, flexible and fast solution for you.

    In case You’re only looking for a easy way to store data and need neither iSCSI nor more than 16TB of space get a “normal” Drobo. Even if you only have a PC without FireWire 800. there are plenty of FireWire Cards for your PCI Express slot, that give you faster access than USB 2.0 does.

     
  • Relying on the Unknown

    Mirco 9:41 on Tuesday, 2. September 2008 | Comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: activedirectory, assignment, business, change, , chaos, company, , , delegation, department, dns, , , it, , , merger, problem

    When merging different companies, one of the most crucial building blocks of future success is a fully merged and centralized IT Management. Why? Because every attempt I witnessed to try something else created chaos. And that’s something you really don’t want within your IT department.

    A small example. One of my customers bought some small companies and integrated them into their Active Directory, leaving every local administrator with a domain administrator account, because that’s what they had before the migration. Sounds fair for the administrators, but a few weeks later some of the mail servers stopped sending email.

    Someone made some small changes to the DNS service, which was Active Directory integrated, so this reduced the potential causes to the Domain Admin group members… all 120 of them. At first this doesn’t look like a huge number, but if you consider that every local administrator and at some sites even local support personnel had domain administrator privileges, it is much to great a risk to be left unchanged.

    Another small example, at another company. While rolling out a new directory structure and migrating every company site into it, all local administrators where reduced from local Domain Administrators to being Domain Users with delegated privileges. Some of them fought fiercely to regain their old “power” and the CIO was forced by some executives to reinstate them.

    The funny thing was one of them sent an email with a question, that most of the central hotline staff could answer, about a problem he had at his site only minutes after the CIO requested to rejoin this particular administrator. The request was cancelled, after we forwarded this email to the CIO.

    The main problem when merging IT departments is, that in most cases you don’t know anything about the people and their skills. Even if, in this case, they have been running the local IT at some sites for years this doesn’t mean they know what they are doing.

    We all know communication is a crucial part of business success and since IT is a crucial part of today’s businesses it’s even more important to know what is going on in your network, on your servers and who is making changes to what.

    That’s why change management was created.

    Sending an email with a problem to a distribution list of 40 administrators doesn’t necessary solve a problem. It will more likely produce another: The problem assignment.

    This approach has two possible paths of solution.

    1. Everyone thinks somebody else is already on it and ignores the email
    2. Two or more Admins will try to solve the same problem at the same time

    In most cases none of these paths will solve the original problem, because every change of one admin will lead to inconclusive result for the other, thus resulting in more changes.

    Taking some time to think, define and plan how your IT environment should work and how this plan can be realised is the first an one of the more difficult steps, but it in the end it will be worth the effort.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel