Latest Updates: Consulting RSS

  • Relying on the Unknown

    Mirco 9:41 on Tuesday, 2. September 2008 | View Comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: activedirectory, assignment, , change, , chaos, company, Consulting, , delegation, department, dns, , , it, , , merger, problem

    When merging different companies, one of the most crucial building blocks of future success is a fully merged and centralized IT Management. Why? Because every attempt I witnessed to try something else created chaos. And that’s something you really don’t want within your IT department.

    A small example. One of my customers bought some small companies and integrated them into their Active Directory, leaving every local administrator with a domain administrator account, because that’s what they had before the migration. Sounds fair for the administrators, but a few weeks later some of the mail servers stopped sending email.

    Someone made some small changes to the DNS service, which was Active Directory integrated, so this reduced the potential causes to the Domain Admin group members… all 120 of them. At first this doesn’t look like a huge number, but if you consider that every local administrator and at some sites even local support personnel had domain administrator privileges, it is much to great a risk to be left unchanged.

    Another small example, at another company. While rolling out a new directory structure and migrating every company site into it, all local administrators where reduced from local Domain Administrators to being Domain Users with delegated privileges. Some of them fought fiercely to regain their old “power” and the CIO was forced by some executives to reinstate them.

    The funny thing was one of them sent an email with a question, that most of the central hotline staff could answer, about a problem he had at his site only minutes after the CIO requested to rejoin this particular administrator. The request was cancelled, after we forwarded this email to the CIO.

    The main problem when merging IT departments is, that in most cases you don’t know anything about the people and their skills. Even if, in this case, they have been running the local IT at some sites for years this doesn’t mean they know what they are doing.

    We all know communication is a crucial part of business success and since IT is a crucial part of today’s businesses it’s even more important to know what is going on in your network, on your servers and who is making changes to what.

    That’s why change management was created.

    Sending an email with a problem to a distribution list of 40 administrators doesn’t necessary solve a problem. It will more likely produce another: The problem assignment.

    This approach has two possible paths of solution.

    1. Everyone thinks somebody else is already on it and ignores the email
    2. Two or more Admins will try to solve the same problem at the same time

    In most cases none of these paths will solve the original problem, because every change of one admin will lead to inconclusive result for the other, thus resulting in more changes.

    Taking some time to think, define and plan how your IT environment should work and how this plan can be realised is the first an one of the more difficult steps, but it in the end it will be worth the effort.

     
  • ITology

    Mirco 15:35 on Sunday, 11. November 2007 | View Comments Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , approach, Consulting, , , maintanance, , open source

    “We use Windows/Linux/Unix/MacOS/Oracle/DB2/SAP/etc.”

    “It has to be OpenSource”

    “We don’t use Microsoft”

    Do any of these sound familiar?

    In the last few years IT seemed to have developed an almost religious approach to solutions and tools. Especially with the growth of the open source movement.

    Don’t get me wrong. I like open source software and use a lot of it… at home.

    When I ask the CIOs and administrators I’m consulting about the why I usually get the “because it’s free” answer. OK, companies these days cut the IT budgets and don’t want to spend any money if possible while at the same time demanding an upkeep or improvement of the current service level.

    Using open source software can help cutting cost, if you’re willing to do without support or warranty. Another thing are the varieties of different open source license agreements. Some of them simply won’t apply to a business environment.

    Using ideology or the most current hype is the wrong approach to any problem.

    Start at the solution. Define what you currently need to solve and take your current IT environment into planning. Building a new solution from scratch isn’t the best idea, because you probably already have some of the components you’ll need to implement your solution.

    Example: We were consulting a new customer who had some issues with the administrators workload. OK, that’s not very unusual. Most managers will lay off some IT personnel before decommissioning unused hard-/software to save money.

    Well, it turned out they had no automated installation process for the workstations, no software deployment, no patch management, no document management, … and no budget.

    At this point as a consultant you have two options: Pack you bag and go home, because no budget means no money for new contracts… or find out what they already have to reduce their workload, and cost structure, which will free money from the IT budget.

    I usually tend to use option b.

    Why? Because this is why they called us in the first place. They just didn’t know.

    Most companies have a Microsoft Windows based environment. Yeah, I know they’re evil.. just like Google, Facebook, TimeWarner, Fox and George Bush jr. but in this case actually makes all of the problems listed above very easy to address… and the best part is, it’s totally free software.

    Free? Yep, almost everything you need to solve this is already built into Windows Server, so the only invest in the solution is the time to install and configure.

    • Automated installation is provided by RIS, ADS, WDS. RIS is a component of Windows 2000 and 2003 (up to SP1), ADS is part of the AIK collection which can be downloaded from the Microsoft website. WDS is the new service which was installed on ‘Windows Server 2003 with SP2 and is dedicated for installing Vista. All you need is a server (which is no DHCP) with a second partition with about 4GB of free storage.
    • Patch Management can be done with WSUS, although it’s only for Microsoft products it will reduce the manual administration tasks on the workstations significantly. All you need is a Windows Server 2003 you can install an IIS on and a SQL Server 2005 (if you have on good, if not you can use the Express Edition in small and medium environments). Just keep in mind that you will have to authorize the downloaded patches before they can be installed.
    • Document Management is more difficult. But as long as you only want to keep project documents organized and want to get everyone using the same document templates… why not use SharePoint Services? Like the other two it’s free and well documented and most importantly easier to manage than a loose fileserver with shared folders.

    We could have tried selling some overpriced enterprise solution or opt with an all open source system, but using what they already have is the best approach.

    The administrators don’t have to learn an all new software of operating system, but instead learn how to use their operating system more effectively. It will save them a lot of time which had been wasted with manual administrative work and allows them to spend more time on the really important tasks.

    It’s basically like IBM said: “Find out how to make money with things you already have”, although I don’t think they intended to give you an almost cost free solution.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel